Azam vs State Of H.P on 2 May, 2015
According to her, Ext. 2, 3, 4 & 5 yielded degraded DNA and STR
amplification through PCR was not successful despite repeated attempts
Search Results Page
Did you search for
DNA DEGRADE
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.74 seconds)Azam vs State Of H.P on 2 May, 2015
According to her, Ext. 2, 3, 4 & 5 yielded degraded DNA and STR
amplification through PCR was not successful despite repeated attempts
State Of Punjab vs Ram Sewak on 23 February, 2015
Punjab, who confirmed the presence of semen on
the swabs. For DNA examination, blood samples of the respondent as also
of the two ladies alleged ... report of the laboratory, the samples being highly
degraded and putrefied, DNA isolation and amplification was not possible.
The remnants of the samples are said
State vs . Vikas on 28 November, 2015
State vs . Vikas on 28 November, 2015
1
FIR No. 357/12
PS - Mukharjee Nagar
State vs . 1. Vijay on 27 May, 2015
Maternity Termination Product for DNA Isolation and its comparison
with the DNA abstracted from the control blood samples using standard
operational procedures. After examination ... report. He was of the opinion that DNA extracted from Ex.
1, MTP Product is either degraded or insufficient as evident from
State vs . Surender on 26 September, 2015
Ashutosh has further deposed that he had made the
DNA profile and after conclusion, the DNA profiling (STR
Page ... conclude that the DNA profile of the source of
exhibit or exhibit 1B, 2a, 2b and 4b was similar with the DNA
profile from
State vs . Johnson Etc. on 11 December, 2015
victim. The female DNA was matched from the source of
exhibit i.e. skirt of victim. Male DNA was generated from the source of exhibit ... male DNA i.e. of Vikas or Rakesh. DNA could
not be generated from the blood of accused Johnson or Deepak due to degradation
State vs Vishal Kumar on 31 March, 2015
DNA
profiling (STR analysis) performed on the exhibits, DNA profile from the source
i.e. blood sample of deceased was found similar with DNA profile ... degradation. Nonetheless, the clothes recovered at the instance of accused and
which the accused was wearing at the relevant time matched with the DNA
profile
State vs Kanshu Yadav on 16 October, 2015
DNA profile
was attempted to be generated, it could be generated only from Ex. 3 and not
from the remaining three exhibits due to degradation
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson ... vs Intex Technologies (India) Limited on 13 March, 2015
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson ... vs Intex Technologies (India) Limited on 13 March, 2015
Author: Manmohan Singh