technique for DNA profiling and mitochondrial DNA analysis
is preferable.
21. Likewise he denied suggestion thatmS ... procedure is the DNA'...ixs first from-*. the sample,
DNA profile are prepared,._'t)y 16 system kit
and then is performed
coding and decoding.
2. The DNA was extracted from the source of the
samples sent.
3. The DNA was quantified from the above samples ... then amplified by the polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) using VersaPlexTM 27PY System
kit containing primers for 23 autosomal STR loci
gender marker Amelogenin and three
received on 28.09.2017 were given
DNA No.397/2017 and the 2nd sample received on 10.10.2017
was given DNA No.414/2017. She has also ... DNA was
extracted from the sources of the samples sent in Item Nos. 1,
2 & 3. She has also deposed that DNA was quantified
received in
the laboratory vide letter under reference 2 and registered
as DNA 166/2022 on 16.02.2022 concerned with
T.Narsipura Police Station, Crime ... coding and decoding.
2 The DNA was extracted from the source of sample
sent.
3. The DNA was quantified from the above sample and
then
RARDE
HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER
POR RESPONDENTS . 4 TO 3}.
ddd
KIT PRITMONS ARE FILED UNDER
THESE.
ARTICLES 228 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ... Fags
Bosc
'dna,
Vnetitien ran: by
. the Devartment head approved their ay
- from the dete of their initial appointment but £
slater date arwd accordin
Dr A Parthasarathy vs State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2011
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
Murali vs State Of Karnataka on 23 October, 2025
Author: M.G.S.Kamal
Bench
The State Of Karnataka vs Ramesh on 23 October, 2025
Author: M.G.S.Kamal
Ramesh vs State Of Karnataka on 23 October, 2025
Author: M.G.S.Kamal
Bench
Sri Bhaskar @ Raju vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 October, 2025
Author: M.G
