appellant.
41. Further, as per forensic evidence of DNA profiling
observation the DNA isolated from Ex.1 (axe), Ex.3a (sweater
of
of appellant ... autosomal STR loci and
amelogenin with Powerplex 21 PCR Amplification Kit.
Identical DNA profile was obtained from Ex.1 (axe), Ex.3a
(sweater of appellant
Patan Mohammad Rafi Giddu, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 29 May, 2020
Bench
Exam:- 1. DNA was extracted from the blood
sample detected in Ext. A, C, J, Z6 and Z7 by organic extraction
method
DNA was extracted ... AMPFLSTR
identifier Plus TM PCR amplification Kit. The amplified products alogn
with controls were run on the automated DNA sequencer. The sizing of
the fragments
Identifiler plus PCR amplification kit was used. Gene-
Mapper ID-X software was used for STR analysis and
DNA profiling in each of the Exhibits
blood grouping. For DNA
examination, the source of exhibit 3, 4 and 5 were subjected to DNA
isolation. However DNA could not be isolated from ... DNA was isolated from the source of Ex. 3 & 5 and DNA
profile was generated by using AMP FI identifier plus Amplification kit
DNA isolation by organic extraction method,
High Molecular Weight DNA could be isolated
from Exhibits A, B & C while degraded DNA was
30
recovered ... Plexd 16 kit. Allelles of all loci
in the Exhibits amplified successfully. The
amplified products alongwith controls were run
on Automated DNA Sequencer and analysis
State vs . Khem Chand on 6 January, 2021
IN THE COURT OF SH. SHIVAJI ANAND
State vs . (1) Ranjan on 14 January, 2015
IN THE COURT OF Dr. KAMINI LAU
Ram Tej vs State on 18 May, 2023
Author: Mukta Gupta
Bench: Mukta Gupta
N
Manoj vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 May, 2022
Author: S. Ravindra Bhat
