Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.03 seconds)

State vs . Raju on 29 October, 2014

DNA isolation. DNA was isolated from the source of exhibits '1d', '1e', '1f' & '2' and DNA ... profiles were generated by using Amp Fl Identifiler plus PCR Amplification Kit. However, DNA could not be isolated from the source of exhibits
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Narayan on 9 May, 2014

accused. DNA EXAMINATION Exhibits '1A', '1B', '1C' & '3' wee subjected to DNA isolation. DNA was isolated ... Narayan Identification Form No. 1 DNA EXAMINATION Exhibits '4' was subjected to DNA isolation. DNA was isolated from the source of exhibit
Delhi District Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Sukhdev on 25 January, 2014

Blood could not be detected on exhibit '1c'. DNA EXAMINATION Exhibits '1ghj' (cervical mucus swab, vaginal smear on microslides and vaginal ... were subjected to DNA isolation. DNA was isolated from exhibits '1ghj'. DNA was amplifies using Identifiler plus STR amplification kit. Gene Mapper
Delhi District Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Tarun Kumar on 29 August, 2014

underwear (of victim) were subjected to DNA isolation. DNA was isolated from Exhibit '3' i.e. blood sample (of accused Tarun Kumar ... careful perusal and analysis of the DNA Finger Printing evidence on record, it clearly shows that the DNA (STR analysis) profiling performed on the source
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next