parties
in her application under Section 12 of the DV Act, 2005 being Misc. (DV) Case No.
04/2016.
7. Finding that the application ... said GR Case.
8. For the reasons above, the Court is of the view that if the said case being
Misc. (DV) Case
DV case, are seeking to quash present case
against them in the said DV case by inter alia
contending that as under ... Petitioners to face the trial,
which is unnecessary in the DV Case. Hence,
the continuation of the proceedings in the DV
Case against the Petitioners
demanded
anything directly from me or my parents. I had filed the case of
498A against him and his family on the ground that whenever ... statement in case before Ld. MM dealing with DV case. It is wrong
to suggest that whenever my husband approached to take me with
petitioners submits that
the aforesaid case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2,
namely, Smt.Nilofar. The case is at the initial stage ... paid to the respondent No.2 at the time of withdrawing
DV case against the petitioners. The balance amount
against Respondent No. 2.
5. During the pendency of the case under the DV Act , the Court referred
the parties to mediation for exploring ... dated 11.08.2023. It is
further stated in the petition that the case under DV Act has also been
disposed of as withdrawn
Indian Penal Code 1860 against the petitioner and his family
members;
(b) Case No MJCR 200039/2017 pending before the Family Court Ujjain, MP
under ... District and Sessions Court, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh as CRA for
DV case under Section 29 .
5 Both the counsel state that the parties have been
FIRST PART .
AND WHEREAS the Respondent wife has also filed a DV
case / MC no. 281/2019 against the parties of the
first part ... jurisdiction of
Delhi Court.
(iv) The respondent wife shall withdraw the DV Case
MC NO. 281 OF 2018 pending in the Court
short " The Act of 2005") bearing DV Case
No.245/2016. It is also pointed out that there was specific issue
framed
matrimonial discord, on 10.08.2017 the respondent No.2 filed
a DV case against the petitioners. On 19.07.2017 the aforesaid FIR was
registered
registered against the
petitioners. The respondent No.2 also filed case under DV Act against the
petitioner No.1 and against order passed ... since respondent No.2 has withdrawn the case under DV Act . The
parties have also obtained divorce by mutual consent. Pursuant to
settlement, the petitioner
