Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2299 (1.50 seconds)

Fiit Jee Ltd. vs Harsh Vardhan Sikka on 27 April, 2022

consideration falls within the ambit of `service' as defined in the  Consumer Protection Act , were upheld. Relevant part of the said judgment reads thus ... consideration falls within the ambit of `service' as defined in the  Consumer Protection Act . Fees are paid for services to be rendered
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fiitjee Ltd. vs Ajai Patel on 29 April, 2022

consideration falls within the ambit of `service' as defined in the  Consumer Protection Act , were upheld. Relevant part of the said judgment reads thus ... consideration falls within the ambit of `service' as defined in the  Consumer Protection Act . Fees are paid for services to be rendered
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abb India Ltd vs Bangalore-Ltu on 28 April, 2022

measurements Act are framed having the ultimate consumer in mind; • The word 'consumer' has been defined in the Consumer protection ... commercial purpose is not treated as consumer. Therefore, when the word 'consumer' is not defined under the Act and Consumer Protection
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay P. Ahire vs Living Media India Ltd. on 29 July, 2022

consideration before us is whether Appellant falls under the definition of Consumer as defined under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 . DISMISSED PAGE ... District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II is partly upheld and modified to the extent that Appellant is a Consumer as defined under Consumer Protection
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next