reserved and eemhlg
um ibsr' ' pfuhuuiicefiieiii ef Jee'."emee'. Luis day, . .NA_N!)
perlain in the same assesses
without
coi3jside:it1§£.he_: explanation shown by
the q
(2) \}sz3.eme:%ehe~,Aeeessmg Oflicer was justified
lettyizlg ihm:eet__invoidng Section
would not be of any
consequence as held by the Supt-'eme~ tin 197.7
13
SC 1489 Where under it is held
quash the petitioner is
_Aj
'
Then. a puma? an we ¢eme%% .- gum, day
t..e Geu.*1., ..HL#.de¥t1\;e;jeVf
achoafis may the and children
wmzki be without any
jussfifnatimi. eme mi eam
and ;§*a:}»* in. the society, he should
be may in. the rowdy
KARNATAKA, BANGALQRE
DATED THIS THE 17TH my OF' SEm'EMEE§Fé _
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 7RA3*;£ :»§::§'HAraj:eE.}}§:3Y*
BEFORE
BHAGYABATI PRAMANEK AME emees repos'ified,§§éVV:LC'2'G{§'{§')
4 SCC 490, it has been ebserved:-aéifu
said period was eet off against
o }%'eme period by taking the aid or Section 423 of
Aggrieved by the lower appellate court
Siipreine Qomt 225-5 he submits that "etitirner is
it _ Supi*eme'"Coiirt held as under:
V A. , "Setofi
Author: Subhash B.Adi
Bench: Subhash B.Adi
SS rss re EME FETE WA Wr RAWAL OTE LW WP RARINVALARA THiott UUUAL UP KAKINAIAKA HIGH