documents
was committed before producing the document
before the Court therefore, the aid bar would not
be applicable to a case where forgery document ... upon
administration of justice. It is possible that
such forged document or forgery may
16
cause a very serious or substantial injury
to a person
complainant/Commissioner,
TMC, Mulbagal is that, when he verified the
documents pertaining to katha No.9923/5 of Mulbagal
Town, it was registered ... Vijaya Kumari
w/o Pattabi of Mallekuppa Village by using forgery
documents by the accused/petitioner herein and there
was no 'e' property
forged the document and used the
- 17 -
same as a genuine document by knowing fully well that it
is a forged document, then under such ... document
himself or that the person independently
- 18 -
charged for forgery of the document must of
necessity be convicted, before the person
using the forged
assigning any
justifiable reason. The documents sought to be
produced by the prosecution are vital documents in
establishing forgery and breach of trust committed ... produce the documents
morefully described in the list of documents. The
documents sought to be produced are vital documents
in establishing forgery and breach
material to
show as to who committed the alleged forgery or
interpolation of documents. The only material produced
along with the charge sheet ... claim of respondent No.2, the alleged act
of forgery or falsification of documents were carried out,
undeniably the Insurance Company namely, ICICI
Lombard General
impugned action
5
contending that, specific allegations of forgery and falsification of
documents have been alleged against petitioners. The matter
calls for investigation and hence ... before any
criminal authorities. Merely because the complainants allege
forgery of the document, it cannot be presumed that the
document in question has been brought
availment of the loan and
execution of the documents. He did not allege any
forgery of the signatures.
18. In the cross-examination ... document for
expert's opinion, though defendant disputed
execution of the document, firstly he did not allege
any forgery of signatures; secondly, before
copious
allegations in the complaint that the alleged acts of forgery and
falsification of documents were done by accused Nos.1 and 2. In
paragraph ... insofar as petitioner is concerned. All the allegations of
falsification of documents and forgery are only directed against
accused Nos.1 and 2. There
which
was demolished on 27.06.2011 and for an
enquiry for the forgery of document and fraud
committed by respondents
impression that the plaintiff has not proved the very
execution of the documents, pro-note and consideration receipt.
The very approach of the Trial Court ... which are the documents containing admitted signature of the
defendant, the defendant ought to have sent the documents
Exs.P2 and P3 to Hand
