R. R. Chari vs State Of U.P on 28 March, 1962
Pichai and S. Venkatakrishnan, for the
appellant.
SarjooPrasad, G.C.Mathur and G.P.Lal, for the respondent.
1962. March 28. The Judgement
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 153 (2.35 seconds)Chhadami Lal Jain And Others vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Andanother on 14 September, 1959
Misc.
No. 1 of 1956.
G. S. Pathak and Mohan Behari Lal, for the appellants.
G. C. Mathur, C. P. Lal and G. N. Dikshit
Vishwanath vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 3 September, 1959
P. Sinha and S. D. Sekhri, for the appellant.
G. C. Mathur and C. P. Lal (for G. N. Dikshit), for the
respondent.
1959. September
Atiabari Tea Co., Ltd vs The State Of Assam And Others. And ... on 16 August, 1960
trade and commerce and
Art. 19(1)(g) with the right of an individual: 1955 P ... Rajasthan
adopted the submissions made by the Attorney-General.
G. C. Mathur and C. P. Lal, for the Intervener No. 6, the
State of Uttar
Sales Tax Officer, Banaras & Others vs Kanhaiya Lal Mukundlal Saraf on 23 September, 1958
Sanyal, Additional Solicitor-General of India,
G. C. Mathur and C. P. Lal, for the appellants.
P. R. Das and B. P. Maheshwari
I. C. Golaknath & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anrs.(With Connected ... on 27 February, 1967
I. C. Golaknath & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anrs.(With Connected ... on 27
Raghubar Dayal Jai Prakash vs The Union Of India And Others on 12 September, 1961
contravene
Art. 19 (1) (f ) and (g).
(5) that s.16 of the Act could not be challenged as either
a piece of excessive delegation ... petitions).
B. P. Maheshwari, for respondent No. 2 (In Petn. Nos. 22
and 25 of 1959).
G. C. Mathur, for respondent No. 2 (In Petn
Tata Engineering And Locomotive Co. Ltd vs State Of Bihar And Others on 25 February, 1964
Palkhivala, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and
Ravinder Narain, for the petitioners (in W.P ... respondents (in W.P. Nos. 79 and
80 of 62).
G. S. Pathak, B. Dutta, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and
Ravinder Narain
The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Mohammad Naim on 15 March, 1963
Misc. Case No. 348/1961.
C. B. Agarwala, G. C. Mathur, Shankar Sahai and C. P. Lal,
for the appellant.
J. P. Goyal
M/S. Anwar Khan Mehboob & Co vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others on 6 October, 1965
directed lo this difference.
[47 C; 48 B-C; 49 F-G]
The plea of res judicata must also fail because the two
causes ... enforcement of fundamental rights.
G. S. Pathak, P. R. Naolekar, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C.
Mathur and Ravinder Narain, for the petitioner.
C. K. Daphtary