same mutated in the name of the purchaser (for short the disputed GPA).
3. On 29.6.1996, the 1st defendant-Prem Singh, on the basis ... said disputed GPA, executed an agreement to sell in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to sell the suit property for Rs. 21 lacs allegedly paid
declaration that
the (i) Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney (GPA), Will,
receipt and affidavit dated 18.10.2004, (ii) Agreement to Sell, GPA,
Will, receipt ... affidavit and possession letter dated 4.11.2004 and
(iii) Agreement to Sell, GPA, Will, receipt, affidavit and possession
letter dated 17.11.2004 be declared null and void
basis of unregistered General Power of
Attorney dated 24.1.87, (hereinafter, "the GPA"),
allegedly executed by the complainant, authorising him to
sell the property ... petitioner No. 2 However, the complainant stated that she
never executed the GPA in his favor authorizing him to
sell the property; she never visited
strained relations with her husband Dipinder
Singh Brar, who by misusing her GPA has firstly open a joint account
in Canara Bank, Chandigarh and then ... Registrar, Chandigarh. Similarly, the petitioner sold her 25%
share through her GPA i.e. her husband Dipinder Singh Brar. The GPA
was registered
complainant, namely, Jiten Mahajan became the owner
of the said property vide GPA executed in his favor by his father,
namely, Sukhdev Raj Mahajan ... been
executed in favor of the complainant by his father. The said GPA
dated 18.09.2019 had been registered at office of Sub Registrar Vivek
Vihar
Narang, and, one, Vinod Kumar. However, the
complainant, the executant of the GPA in favour of the present bail
petitioner, has made an allegation ... that his purported signatures
carried on the GPA rather are forged, and, fabricated, and, therefore, it is a
false document. Moreover, he has alleged, that
presently in the name of co-accused Madeena Khatun.
Thereafter, the GPA was executed between the complainant Nutan
Mishra and co-accused Madeena Khatun ... equal share in the property of their father. By way of GPA, one Mrs.
Jagwati wife of Mr. Lalchand became owner of the property
Report it is mentioned that during investigation it was found
that the GPA of the property in question was checked and it
was found that ... reveals
that during investigation, the said Rais Ahmad told Police that
the GPA was not notarized by him and the signature is also not
genuine
Parminder Singh Thr. Its Gpa Holder ... vs State Of Punjab on 19 May, 2023
Author: Rajesh Bhardwaj
Bench: Rajesh Bhardwaj
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC ... Date of decision: 19.05.2023
Parminder Singh through its GPA Holder Joginder Singh
..... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH
Navjot Singh Through Gpa Holder Nirmal ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 2 February, 2023
CRM-M-5391-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Date of Decision: February 02, 2023
Navjot Singh th. GPA holder Nirmal Singh Marahar
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and ors.
.....Respondents
CORAM
