Inderpal Yadav vs M/O Railways on 6 December, 2022
1
O.A. No. 3475/2017
Item No. 27
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench ... Member (J)
Hon'ble Mr.Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)
Sh. Inderpal Yadav
Age 59 years Store Maintenance
R/o 7/7 Railway Colony
Kishanganj
terms of the judgment of the
Supreme Court of India in Inderpal Yadav v. Union of India & Ors. (1985)
2 SCC 648 his name ... that the applicant was a beneficiary of apex court
judgment in Inderpal Yadav's case (supra) which gave a special
dispensation to the retrenched
dictum laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Inderpal Yadav v/s Union of
India & Ors reported ... Tribunal observed therein
that "there was no stipulation in Inderpal Yadav judgment whether
retrenched casual labourers should have the educational qualification
(CAT/AHMEDABAD BENCH
applicant is based on the apex court
decision in Inderpal Yadav v. Union of India & Ors. - (1985) 2 SCC 648.
According to the respondents ... terms of the apex court direction in
Inderpal Yadav's case a list of retrenched casual labourers in the project
who were in service
been tested for the purpose of regularizing their services." Inderpal Yadav's judgment [1985 (2) SCC 648] had also been noticed therein, whereby ... Railway Administration to frame a scheme for absorption. On perusal of Inderpal Yadav's case (supra) we may note that in Para
Smt Nand Kanwar vs M/O Railways on 24 September, 2025
1
OA No. 746
follow the directions of the Supreme Court in the case of Inderpal Yadav and also the guidelines issued by the Railway Board.
7. Be that ... same was approved with certain modifications in the case of Inderpal Yadav v. Union of India 1985 SCC (L&S) 526 : . The relevant part
before this Court in the Writ Petition No.
147 of 1983 ( Inderpal Yadav & Ors v. Union of India ). This
Court changed the existing prevalent ... respondents dated 12.06.2009 in terms of Honble
Supreme Court order in Inderpal Yadav. That however
also would not be possible once we consider the
condition
before this Court in the Writ Petition No. 147 of 1983 ( Inderpal Yadav & Ors v. Union of India ). This Court changed the existing prevalent ... respondents dated 12.06.2009 in terms of Honble Supreme Court order in Inderpal Yadav. That however also would not be possible once we consider the condition
necessary to set out the sequence of events starting
from Inderpal Yadav case, where admittedly, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
had directed the Railways ... 2017 and conn.cases 26
12. After Inderpal Yadav, the Railway had issued a letter on
20.09.2001 stipulating that a person who had exceeded
