south of Vadaman Punjai, there is a Kai Itteri or a foot-path, which is the northern boundary for the portions owned by the appellant ... Kuttaiparai punjai and this Kai Itteri had been surveyed as Survey No. 233|9, while the Itteri on the east of Kuttaiparai punjai had been
upto the lands of the plaintiffs. The same runs further south as itteri and turns and proceeds towards east along with Itteri to a considerable ... distance and joins in another Itteri running in north south direction, which is to a width of about 40 feet and another Itteri branches from
plaintiff’s and the
defendant’s land, there is an East-West Itteri (pathway) described in the
plaint ‘A’ schedule property to the width ... their partition deed and they are entitled to use the said Itteri
by taking their cars and other vehicles. After the partition they also entered
more than
100 years. Formerly, the said street has been mentioned as itteri in some
documents. The plaintiff's property is situated ... ground that the
suit property has been described as 'itteri' in the
earlier documents, more particularly the usuage of
'itteri
holding that the respondent is entitled to use
the north-south itteri when admittedly there is a
well laid road is available to reach ... with reference to the north-south itteri lying on the eastern side of the
plaintiff's property. The plaintiff would claim that north-south
judis.nic.in
2
the defendants, their men, etc, from dismantling the itteri pathway which
runs East-West which is shown as 'ABCD ... further west, the Palladam-Udumalpet road runs.
From Palladam-Udumalpet road, an itteri pathway runs towards east and
reaches the suit property. The said itteri
shares allotted to the plaintiff and the defendant, the east-west itteri is running and the same is the access for the plaintiff ... common Well and the abovesaid east-west itteri running on the northern side branches towards south up to the common Well portion and hence, there
declaration that they have the right to use the suit property (itteri) to reach LBP canal and for consequential injunction, challenge the findings ... adjacent owners of the suit property, is that the itteri in S.F. Nos. 69 and 70 in Ayalur Village within the Sub-Registration District
Itteri vs The Regional Director on 3 November, 2008
Bench: C.N.Ramachandran Nair , Harun-Ul-Rashid
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ... ITTERI,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.DILIP MOHAN
For Respondent :SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR, SC, ESI CORPN
never used
the suit cart track to reach their land. The 'ittery' is located on the
Northern side of the plaintiffs property, which ... necessity and acquisition of right of easement by prescription;
that the itteri was never been used by the plaintiffs, besides it was unfit as
such
