Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.49 seconds)

Chandrasekharan.C vs Union Of India on 28 February, 2017

under the Liberlized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) was rejected by the respondents. The applicant is a holder of regular ... post of Works Mate of Civil Engineering Department is not brought under LARSGESS Scheme. LARSGESS is an exceptional scheme formulated for certain safety posts
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Jai Pal vs M/O Railways on 19 February, 2019

dated 01.03.2016 (Annexure A-4) for appointment of their wards under the LARSGESS scheme. 3. Heard. 4. Learned counsel submitted that the applicants earlier approached ... Others (CWP NO. 7714/2016), as the matter for appointment under LARSGESS was pending before the Delhi High Court. He submitted that the respondents have
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Shiv Muni vs M/O Railways on 13 February, 2018

appointment of his son Sh. Jitendra Kumar (applicant no.2) under the LARSGESS Scheme by filing accompanying O.A. in 2017, thus, there is huge ... 01072/2017 ) application on 27.4.2012 for appointment of his son under the LARSGESS Scheme, which could not be considered because applicant no.1 was declared
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Inder Singh vs M/O Railways on 11 March, 2019

have 2 (OA No. 060/181/2017) restricted the benefits under the LARSGESS Scheme only to those persons who had retired from service ... been wrongly rejected, therefore, his case has to be considered under the LARSGESS Scheme, if he is otherwise eligible. 2. Considering the prayer made
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document
1