Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1435 (0.64 seconds)

Hakim Singh vs General Manager N C Rly on 9 July, 2019

Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (in short LARSGESS). The claim of the applicants is that Hakin Singh was initially appointed ... that he had moved an application for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) under LARSGESS Scheme and for appointment of his son Laxman Singh (Applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Union Of India vs S.Kasipandy on 4 November, 2016

Liberalised Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (in short LARSGESS). 3. As per the extant guidelines, LARSGESS provides for extension ... added with regular service, for all purposes, including extension of benefit under LARSGESS scheme, and in the above circumstances, the action of writ petitioners
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Manikumar - Full Document

K.A.Moideen vs The General Manager on 18 January, 2016

appointment under Liberalised Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) scheme. Applicant is a Senior Gangman who, according to him, is entitled ... LARSGESS scheme. He states that he had submitted Annexure A/2 application for voluntary retirement and simultaneous consideration of his son Ashraf for appointment
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kapil Dev vs Union Of India And Anr on 1 December, 2021

counsel for the petitioners is that the respondents had implemented the said LARSGESS Scheme qua petitioner No.1, and consequently, granted appointment to petitioner ... Railways since 2013. 5. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, even though the LARSGESS Scheme has been declared to be unconstitutional, we are Signature Not Verified Digitally
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Laxman Singh vs Union Of India (2024:Rj-Jd:39367-Db) on 21 September, 2024

2024] Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) was dismissed. 2. The father of the petitioner was working under safety category with Indian ... petitioner submitted an application seeking appointment under category Grade-D of the LARSGESS Scheme. The respondents- Railway vide order dated 23.07.2013 declared petitioner ineligible
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K Mathur - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next