Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 114 (1.08 seconds)

G Venkatamallu vs M/O Railways on 22 October, 2020

filed in regard to appointment of the ward of the applicant under LARSGESS scheme. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant while ... working as Gangman applied for considering the appointment of his son under LARSGESS scheme against notification dated 19.1.2016 issued by the respondents. When applicant applied
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ganga Sahai vs M/O Railways on 7 August, 2020

Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme For Guaranteed Employment For Safety Staff (LARSGESS)". As per the impugned order dated 23.09.2011 (Annexure A/2), respondents have shown ... applicants were eligible and are entitled for the benefits under the LARSGESS Scheme. The respondents have illegally, arbitrarily and in unjustified manner rejected their claim
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shankar vs General Manager, N E Rly on 1 December, 2020

rejecting the applicant‟s claim for appointment of his son under the LARSGESS Scheme. The above order dated 30.09.2019 has been challenged by means ... voluntarily retirement and requested for recruitment of his son under the LARSGESS Scheme (Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff). Under
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Om Prakash vs General Manager N C Rly on 22 January, 2020

consider his case for retirement and for appointment of his sone under LARSGESS Scheme. 2 3. The Railway was running a Scheme known as Liberalised ... Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (in short LARSGESS). 4. As per the OA, applicant applied for his voluntary retirement on under
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Kumar vs General Manager N C Rly on 19 February, 2020

Liberalised Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (in short LARSGESS). 4. Applicant No.1 Ram Kumar was working in the Railway Department ... Kumar and was reportedly qualified for the selection under the LARSGESS Scheme. It is said that applicant No.1applied for VRS under the aforesaid Scheme
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sushil Ch Barman vs M/O Railways on 12 March, 2020

under Liberalized Active. Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) Scheme vide his application dated 31.01.2014. Accordingly, his son was called ... course training as 'Apprentice ALP for 17 weeks for appointment against LARSGESS. Affer compietion of . training the applicant no.2 appeared ina written fest
Central Administrative Tribunal - Gauhati Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Baijnath Mali vs M/O Railways on 31 January, 2020

Kumar @ Shi Viiay Kumar Bhandari is entitled to Bat employment under the LARSGESS Scheme. 8.3 That th e respondent be direct to consider the application ... give appointment to the son of the applicant under fhe said LARSGESS scheme forthwith If necessary by adjusting the pensionary benefit of the applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Gauhati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajkumar Gurjar vs M/O Railways on 9 September, 2020

Helper under Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) on completion of 56 years of his service. On 22.08.2017, the applicant ... applicants have filed the present Original Application for seeking appointment under LARSGESS Scheme of July 2017. 3. The respondents after issue of notices have filed
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next