violated the accounting standards. The
WTM found that various provisions of LODR
Regulations was not complied with during the three
financial years and there were ... were raised by the appellant with
regard to non-compliance of the LODR Regulations. In
one such instance it was urged that the Company
charges in the
show cause notice are as follows:
A. ―Violations of LODR Regulations, 2015 due
to misrepresentation, including of financials
and misuse of funds ... violated the accounting standards.
The WTM found that various provisions of LODR
Regulations were not complied with during the three
financial years and there were
financials
and misuse of funds/books of accounts in
violation of LODR Regulations, 2015;
B. Non furnishing of information/Non-
cooperation by the Company with ... forensic auditor;
C. Other violations of LODR Regulations,
2015.
D. Violation of PFUTP Regulations, 2003."
6
6. The WTM after considering the replies
Morinda Chamkaur Sahib Road to Ropar Chamkaur Sahib via Kandhoula
131
Ludhiana
LODR-21
Road along Sirhind Canai Dholran Bridge to Neelon Bridge
132
Ludhiana ... LODR-25
Neelon Doraha
133
S.A.S Nagar
SASODR-2
Chandigarh Mullanpur Road
134
S.A.S Nagar
SASODR-3
Kharar Bassi road
financials and
misuse of funds/books of accounts in violation
of LODR Regulations, 2015;
B. Non furnishing of information/Noncooperation
by the Company with ... violated
the accounting standards. The WTM found that various
provisions of LODR Regulations were not complied with
during the three financial years and there were
Listing Obligations and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015", (for short "SEBI (LODR)
Regulations")
5. On 2 March 2017, respondent no. 3 - BSE issued ... submission of Financial Results under Regulation 33 of
the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, inter alia stating that the company had not
submitted to the Exchange
Listing Obligations and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015", (for short "SEBI (LODR)
Regulations")
5. On 2 March 2017, respondent no. 3 - BSE issued ... submission of Financial Results under Regulation 33 of
the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, inter alia stating that the company had not
submitted to the Exchange
Bull Lohara Alias Lodre Lohra vs The State Of Jharkhand on 2 July, 2013
Author: H. C. Mishra
Bench: H.C. Mishra
IN THE HIGH ... JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3442 of 2013
Bull Lohra @ Lodre Lohra ..... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
CORAM
Morinda Chamkaur Sahib Road to Ropar Chamkaur Sahib via Kandhoula
131
Ludhiana
LODR-21
Road along Sirhind Canai Dholran Bridge to Neelon Bridge
132
Ludhiana ... LODR-25
Neelon Doraha
133
S.A.S Nagar
SASODR-2
Chandigarh Mullanpur Road
134
S.A.S Nagar
SASODR-3
Kharar Bassi road
read with Clause 6 Part A Schedule III of the LODR.
7. On 02.01.2025, CIRP was initiated by NCLT. Appellant claims that the
order
