overlooked the facts that in
justification of title the plaintiffs have produced
LRRORs (Exhibit-3 series) and rent receipts
(Exhibit-1 series) in their names ... legal
representatives of Ramanath Shit should go
away altogether from the LRRORs and why the
entire suit plot should be recorded in the names
Mouza-
Banshpul, PS- Habra never owned by said Tafurunnesa inasmuch as LRROR No.
181 of Mouza Banshpul, PS- Habra, Exhibit-15 stands recorded ... factual aspects of the case on
record. Adverting my attention to the LRROR (Exhibit-15) in respect of Khatian
No. 181 of Mouza- Banshpul
same
with right, title, interest and their names were recorded in the LRROR in LR
Khatian No. 1455 ... delivery of possession to him and petitioner No. 1
recorded his name LRROR in LR Khatian No. 4989 and he paid rent to the
State
property. The plaintiffs alleged that there is an erroneous
recording in the LRROR showing the said portion as 'Dala'. The
plaintiff alleged that ... tank fishery" and the
names have been duly recorded in the LRROR. However, the
portion over which there are now carrying on pisci culture
that the suit property has been
recorded in his name in the LRROR and threatened that he
will forcibly dispossess the plaintiff from the suit ... been
recorded in the name of defendant No.1 in LRROR which is
absolutely erroneous as defendant No.1 has no right title
or interest
property on the basis of inclusion of their names
in RS and LRROR. The plaintiffs soon thereafter made enquiries when it
became revealed that ... years. The defendants alleged that they are paying
government rent and the LRROR has been duly published in the name of
the defendants. The defendants
petitioner no.3.
14. It is submitted that from the copies of LRROR, as
has been annexed with the instant writ petition at
page ... would reveal that even at the
time of preparation of LRROR, the name of the
original allottee (by way of settlement) was recorded
possession of the same and on the basis of her
possession the LRROR was prepared in her
name. It is also claimed by the plaintiff ... further claimed that the property was recorded in
her name in LRROR under Khatian No. 21, She
filed Exhibit-3(a) in support
that Chowdhury Lal Saha was original owner of the suit
property and LRROR prepared in his name but the plaintiff never purchased
the suit property ... marked as exhibit '1'
and the certified copy of LRROR which is marked as exhibit '2'. On the
contrary defendant adduced
title on the allegation that such entries in the RSROR and LRROR
are illegal.
The learned Trial Court dismissed the suit ex parte since ... collusion with the settlement employees in the
preparation of the RSROR and LRROR in the name of the
defendants. When a record of right
