Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Jangali Pasi vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Another on 16 April, 2015

correctly identified by the witness)". 19. PW2 Manoj Kumar is a layman and is a chance witness and has no intention to falsely implicate

persuasion of the petitioner cannot be accepted as he is not a layman or a rustic. Evidently the cause of action arose when the complainant

after allowances had been made for the fact that he was a layman. As Bayley, J. said : "The question is shortly this, whether

evidence of the accused, he is not an ordinary layman or rustic villager, on the other hand, he is also well educated having worldly knowledge

work etc., but the accused is not an illiterate person or a layman, on the other hand he is business person having worldly knowledge, knowing

work etc., but the accused is not an illiterate person or a layman, on the other hand he is business person having worldly knowledge, knowing

blank cheques as stated by the complainant. Because, the complainant is not layman, on the other hand, she is an educated lady having worldly knowledge

accident to the nearest police station. Accused is not an ordinary layman. But, in this case the accused has not informed about the accident either

extent, he has given evidence before the court. Accused is not a layman or an illiterate. He is working in Police Department