said question it is necessary to know and understand what these legal doctrines of stare decisis and prospective overruling means, before applying the same ... aforesaid two legal doctrines it is clear both the doctrines are inter connected. They are overlapping. The doctrine of stare decisis is a rule
passed and the sentence imposed is illegal. He
submitted that, the legal doctrine res ipsa loquitur,
whereupon reliance has been placed by the Courts below ... case, the Courts below are justified in
applying the legal doctrine res ipsa loquitur.
6. In view of the rival contentions and the record
course of time, the legal position has attained an extent of
certainty, so that, through out the country the said law is
being applied ... promise or whether he is exculpated on the
basis of some legal doctrine. The
discussion made in paragraph 239 of
28
Breach of Contract
published, there was no judicial pronouncement about the legal effect or the validity of those regulations. It was only for the first time that this ... that the petitioners were not entitled to invoke the doctrine of estoppel either equitable or promissory as there is no estoppel against law; that
modern doctrine as opposed to the Blackstonian theory was suitable for a fast moving society. It was a pragmatic solution reconciling the two doctrines ... wide and elastic terms as to enable this Court to formulate legal doctrines to meet the ends of justice. The only limitation therein is reason
promise or whether he is exculpated on the basis of some legal doctrine. The discussion made in para 239 of Breach of Contract by Carter
arbitration clause in another agreement finds its source on
the legal basis as enunciated by the Apex Court in the case
of Chloro Controls (supra ... apply to
private as well as public legal entities.
103.2. The second theory includes the legal
doctrines of agent-principal relations, apparent
authority, piercing
called doctrine of pleasure, which is not permissible in law. In
fact it amounts to use of doctrine of pleasure at the whims and
fancies ... such legal
limits. It would indeed be paradoxical if they were not
imposed."
21. In paragraph 24 Apex Court held that the
doctrine
called doctrine of
pleasure, which is not permissible in law. In fact it amounts
to use of doctrine of pleasure at the whims and fancies ... such legal limits. It would
indeed be paradoxical if they were not imposed."
21. In paragraph 24 Apex Court held that the
doctrine
contend with the constraints imposed by the
outside environment. Unfortunately, current legal
doctrine rarely accounts for such constraints, and
thus environmental stability is threatened.
Historically ... environment"
bear a very close conceptual relationship to this
legal doctrine. Under the Roman law these
resources were either owned
