property to defendant no. 5 is hit by principle of
'lispendens' ? OPP
11. Relief.
6. EVIDENCE:
6.1 Plaintiff's Evidence:
6.2 Plaintiff ... property to defendant
no. 5 is hit by principle of 'lispendens' ? OPP
Judgment CS. No. 8154/16
Pradeep Kumar Jha Vs. Dalip Kumar
transfer was made during the
pendency of the suit. The principle of lispendens would apply
and the plaintiff is not require to pay advaloram court
dated 10.01.2002
was bad on account of applicability of the principle of lispendens, which
is a principle which embodies that the subject matter
charges, claims,
CS-107/02/06/03 Page No.15/17
demands, lispendens or attachments whatsoever.
That all the owners of buildings in Anand Vihar
poceedings and, therefore, her objections are hit by the Doctrine of
'lispendens'.
6 Sh. Dinesh Garg, Advocate for the petitioner/applicant
Kishan Swroop ... also argued that the objections are
barred by the Doctrine of 'lispendens' and even otherwise, the suit
property could not be transferred
that the said land is
free from all encumbrances, charges, liens, lispendens,
attachments, trust, acquisitions, requisitions etc.
whatsoever or howsoever and there is no litigation
property in question is free
from all liens, charges, encumbrances and lispendens and that there is
no notice of attachment, acquisition or requisition or notice
