Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Amit, or Krishan Kumar. (ix) The defence, of the appellant, that the oppressor of ‗C' was, actually Sonu, was improbable. There

fact, name the appellant as one of the oppressors of ‗S', as informed to her by the CSI. 29.10 In her Compliance report ... 14th February, 2013, he did not name the appellant as his oppressor, in her presence. She also acknowledged that ‗S' had always named some

Industrial Tribunal, in which the identities of the complainant and her alleged oppressor already stand disclosed.] 1. The issue in controversy, before me, is whether

Raghav vs State on 24 May, 2018 Author: C. Hari Shankar Bench: S.P.Garg

moving for contempt; except, perhaps, the spiritual satisfaction in seeing his perceived oppressor brought to book. Contempt is an affront on the authority

moving for contempt; except, perhaps, the spiritual satisfaction in seeing his perceived oppressor brought to book. Contempt is an affront on the authority