Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

facto or de jure. It is not essential that the alleged oppressor is oppressing in order to obtain a financial benefit; conduct maybe oppressive under

Nafan B.V vs Saf Yeast Company Pvt.Ltd. And 7 Ors on 29 October

disclose any cause of action. It is the Mehras who are the oppressors and mismanaged EIL. (ii) Issues raised by Mehras in the petition

oppression even if they do not form the minority shareholders or the oppressors are not the majority shareholders. The only restriction on the members

with the statement that the people have become helpless against their "oppressor or opponent," i.e. the Government; it contrasts the European ... which is material and mean; it has proved the people's oppressor; it is demoralising them by turning out scoundrel patriots; it is irritating

begins with the statement that the people have become helpless against their oppressor or opponent," i.e. the Government; it contrasts the European ... which is material and mean; it has proved the people's oppressor; it is demoralising them by turning out scoundrel patriots; it is irritating

M/S.Sharp And Tannan, Chartered ... vs Saf Yeast Company Pvt.Ltd. And 6 Ors

Lesaffre Et Cie vs Saf Yeast Company Pvt.Ltd. And 7 Ors on 29 October

Arunachalam Muthu And 3 Ors vs Nafan B.V. And 4 Ors on 29 October

disclose any cause of action. It is the Mehras who are the oppressors and mismanaged EIL. (ii) Issues raised by Mehras in the petition