Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Bikramjeet Singh Bhullar vs Yash Raj Films Private Limited & Ors. on 20 December, 2023

Amit, or Krishan Kumar. (ix) The defence, of the appellant, that the oppressor of ‗C' was, actually Sonu, was improbable. There

fact, name the appellant as one of the oppressors of ‗S', as informed to her by the CSI. 29.10 In her Compliance report ... 14th February, 2013, he did not name the appellant as his oppressor, in her presence. She also acknowledged that ‗S' had always named some

tenancy. It was the landlord who was in the position of an oppressor who wanted to exploit the situation obtaining in the context

permissible to dissect the conduct of the alleged oppressor into separate acts of oppression or mis-management. In Shanti Prasad Jain vs. Kalinga Tubes

zeal of either helping the victim of oppression, or in exposing the oppressor enters into the field of investigations or trial of a pending case

overbearing act of respondent Somair Singh Sahni and his attitude as an oppressor. Record also shows that the company is not maintaining the statutory records

company out of action altogether. Even though the oppressor by his oppression brings down the whole edifice destroying the value of his own shares with

displayed rank insensitivity. There no more justice where the victim and the oppressor are treated alike, as where the lion and the lamb are afforded

Amitabh Bachhan Corporation Ltd. vs Om Pal Singh Hoon on 26 March, 1996 Equivalent citations