Amit, or Krishan Kumar.
(ix) The defence, of the appellant, that the oppressor of ‗C'
was, actually Sonu, was improbable. There
justice
demands that the court should protect the oppressed and punish the
oppressor/offender. In complaints under Section 498-A the wife will
invariably
justice
demands that the court should protect the oppressed
and punish the oppressor/offender. In complaints
under Section 498-A the wife will invariably
justice demands that
the Court should protect the oppressed and punish the
oppressor/offender. In complaints under Section 498-A the
wife will invariably
P.Sathish @ Sathish Kumar vs State Rep.By on 13 March, 2023
Author: N.Sathish
N. Veerabrahmam vs State Of Andhra Pradesh Represented By ... on 12 March, 1959
Equivalent citations
should, in the interest of justice, protect the oppressed and punish the oppressor offender (See Arun Vyas 's case cited supra).
26. Thus
lament - "For who would bear the scorns of time, the oppressors' wrong...the law's delays..." Yet it is true
dismay as this inroad of English lawyers; all the Injustice of former oppressors, Asiastic and Europeans appeared as a blessing compared with the justice
justice demands that the Court should protect the
oppressed and punish the oppressor/offender.
..................."
18. A three-Judges Bench of the Apex Court