tenancy. It was the landlord who was in the position of an oppressor who wanted to exploit the situation obtaining in the context
confined merely to conduct designed to secure
pecuniary advantage to the oppressors; they cover
the case of wrongful usurpation of authority, even
though the affairs
this case, asking the oppressed to sell his share to the oppressor not only fails to redress the wrong done to the oppressed but would
either be designed to secure pecuniary advantage to the detriment of the oppressors or wrongful usurpation of authority. The present grievance does not merit
either be designed to secure
pecuniary advantage to the detriment of the
oppressors or wrongful usurpation of
authority."
So, it is the party
revulsion in the minds of the average audience towards the tormentors and oppressors of women. It was observed that to delete or even to reduce
agreement of equal shareholding. It is the petitioner who is the oppressor by starting a competing business. The petitioner has incorporated a company