Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Bikramjeet Singh Bhullar vs Yash Raj Films Private Limited & Ors. on 20 December, 2023

P.Sathish @ Sathish Kumar vs State Rep.By on 13 March, 2023 Author: N.Sathish

P.Sathish @ Sathish Kumar vs State Rep.By on 13 March, 2023 Author: N.Sathish

P.Sathish @ Sathish Kumar vs State Rep.By on 13 March, 2023 Author: N.Sathish

contended that the appellant was the wrongdoer and oppressor during the marriage. 49) She contended that the suit is a counter-blast to her complaint

always been given top priority. An Agency of State cannot be an oppressor of constitutional guaranties and consider itself beyond law. Its actions are always

matter and since similar consent was given by the so called oppressor i.e. the Chief Manager, therefore, matter was closed at the departmental level ... illegal and has been made with a view to favour the oppressor/harasser i.e. the Chief Manager. It is further submitted that to save

Comp case p 868 (Ker). Pecuniary Compensation: 44. An 'oppressor, make compensation to the person, who had suffered at his hands

justice demands that the Court should protect the oppressed and punish the oppressor / offender. In the case u/s 498A IPC, the wife is invariably