post in adherence to the Rules treating themselves to be overage. Hence, acceptance of the writ petitions would be to the benefit of those ... appellant is that the appellant was eligible and was not overage because the notification dated 13.11.1996 applied to his case. It was contended that since
eligible in the next following recruitment, if he/she is not overage by more than 3 years.
Perusal of aforesaid shows that if a candidate ... would be deemed to be eligible in next falling recruitment if not overage by more than 3 years. Petitioners, in the case in hand, have
eligible in the next following recruitment, if he/she is not overage by more than 3 years.
Perusal of aforesaid shows that if a candidate ... would be deemed to be eligible in next falling recruitment if not overage by more than 3 years. Petitioners, in the case in hand, have
decided on 18.8.2011. Therein, it was held that if a candidate is overage than prescribed under the Rules, he would not be entitled for consideration
decided on 18.8.2011. It is a case where petitioner is overage by one month for appointment to the post of Nurse Gr II, hence
