Petitioner knowing it well that even after relaxation he would be overage by more than two months, made an application.
It is submitted that ... applied for the post knowing it well that he is ineligible being overage. If relief is granted then it would be in discrimination
view of the above, a person knowing it well that he is overage applied for the post by default thus should be given benefit ... have applied for the post knowing it well that they are overage, being law abiding. They cannot be discriminated now with those who applied
view of the above, a person knowing it well that he is overage applied for the post by default thus should be given benefit ... have applied for the post knowing it well that they are overage, being law abiding. They cannot be discriminated now with those who applied
post of Assistant Professor (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation) was rejected by treating overage.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is a disabled person, thus ... within age upto 47 years. The respondents, however, declared petitioner to be overage at the age of 45 years only. This is precisely
ground of age.
It is stated that petitioner is overage only by two months, thus application form should not have been rejected on the aforesaid ... limit given under the rules and advertisement. The petitioner is admittedly overage by two months, thus rightly held ineligible for selection.
In the lightof
respondent/s.
BY THE COURT:
It is a case where petitioner are overage for appointment to the post of Pharmacist. Few petitioners made representation
respondent/s.
BY THE COURT:
It is a case where petitioner are overage for appointment to the post of Pharmacist. Few petitioners made representation
Associate Professor. It was precisely on the ground that petitioner being overage and lacking in required experience. The reply to the writ petition has been ... contents of writ petition and find that petitioner is found to be overage as petitioner has attained the age of more than 50 years
Therein also, candidature of the petitioner was rejected holding him to be overage. This Court directed the respondents to consider the case of petitioner
abruptly without following principles of natural justice. Petitioners
are held to be overaged and on that ground alone, their admission
is cancelled, whereas, for similar
