Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that
because of the overage the Petitioner is not eligible to apply
for the above noted posts. Hence
Data Entry
Operator on contractual basis against a vacant post
condoning the overage as per the order dated
25.07.2014 of Hon'ble OAT, Cuttack
test was held after
23.02.2019 and the Petitioners in the meantime became
overaged, they could not make their applications. It is
contended that the Petitioner
years, and in the meantime
Petitioner's mother became overage and because of her
illness she could not accept the job, the ground
Scheme due to illness/illiteracy or lack of minimum
educational qualification or overage then, the case of a member
lying at a lower order
took
place in the year 2015. By then the Petitioner has become overage.
Recently the Petitioner came across a Resolution of the Government
Contractual) for the year 2014-15 was not
considered that he was overaged, does not survive, inasmuch
as a corrigendum dated 06.01.2016 has come
submits further, his client is a qualified person
but considered, overage by those who can employ him. Hence, he is
without employment and cannot
counsel for
the petitioner that in the meantime, the petitioner has become
overaged and would lose his job after rendering satisfactory
work for 24 years
applied in the selection process, but he was not allowed due to
overage. However, it is fairly contended that Petitioner is
continuing on contractual basis
