Search Results Page

Search Results

51 - 60 of 3748 (1.73 seconds)

M/S.Tmt Granites Pvt. Ltd vs The State Environment Impact ... on 29 May, 2020

RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATE ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY, PALLIMUKKU-KANNAMMOOLA RD, OVERBRIDGE, VELAKUDI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695024, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 2 THE MEMBER SECRETARY ... STATE ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY, PALLIMUKKU-KANNAMMOOLA RD, OVERBRIDGE, VELAKUDI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695024, 3 THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, PALAKKAD
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - A Thomas - Full Document

K.Sivadasan vs The Special Tahsildar (La) on 28 May, 2019

pertains to the objection to the alignment for construction of the Railway Overbridge at Koduvally, connecting Thalassery and Koothuparamba area. The second petitioner ... together with the first petitioner, they sought realignment of railway overbridge to avoid certain portion of the property of the second petitioner. Since the suggested
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - H Roy - Full Document

Raju Nandi And 26 Ors vs The Union Of India Rep. By The Secretary ... on 21 November, 2019

issued directing the Railways to review the decision of constructing Railway overbridge at Hojai Main Road, replacing the original site at Railway Level Crossing Gate ... India, Railway Department and other related functionaries questioning the path of overbridge being constructed by the Railway Authorities. It has been pleaded that the Railway
Gauhati High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - A Lamba - Full Document

Azhar Beg vs State Of Up And 3 Others on 9 January, 2025

petitioner purportedly in public interest seeking direction to the respondents to construct overbridge at Rankhandi Gate L-69 as approved earlier in place of Bhaila ... have been made that the respondents had initially decided to construct the overbridge at L-69, however, on account of a political intervention, the location
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs. Mamta Bansal, Tinsukia vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Tinsukia on 24 May, 2023

Mamta Bansal........................................................................Appellant C/o Bansal Trade & Agency, Near Overbridge, Makum Road, P.O. Tinsukia-786125. [PAN: ACAPB4268P] vs. ITO, Ward-1, Tinsukia..............................................................Respondent ... Anand Kumar Bansal...............................................................Appellant C/o Bansal Trade & Agency, Near Overbridge, Makum Road, P.O. Tinsukia-786125. [PAN: ACAPB4257A] vs. ITO, Ward-3, Tinsukia
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Gauhati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   2 3 4 5 6   7 8 9 10 11 Next