Learned Counsel would rely on
State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh , P.T. Thomas v. Thomas Job ,
Bar Council of India v. Union of India ... express prohibition in the particular Act. ( Dhulabhai v.
State of M.P. , ). Exclusion of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is
not to be readily
interfered with in revision either under Article 227, or Section 115 C.P.C.
10. Save legal infirmity, it is not open to the High ... appraisal of evidence is not contemplated under Section 115 C.P.C. P.T. Thomas v. Thomas
Counsel for the writ petitioners referred to K. Rajam Raju v. Smt. P. Rangamma , for the proposition that no separate suit is maintainable and that ... learned Counsel for respondents 2 to 5 relied on P.T. Thomas v. Thomas Job and Board of Trustees of the Port of Visakhapatnam
learned Counsel relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in P. T. Thomas v. Thomas , 2005 (1) Decisions To-day (SC) 631, submits that ... extended was considered recently by the Supreme Court in P. T. Thomas v. Thomas wherein it was observed:
"In our opinion, the award
India and
challenging the correctness of the award on any ground - P.T. THOMAS vs. THOMAS
JOB1 .
7. Award of the Lok Adalat does
placed strong reliance on a decision of the Apex Court in P.T. Thomas v. Thomas Job (2005) 6 S.C.C. 478.
4. Heard ... plaintiff in instalments @ Rs. 3,500/- p.m. from 5th day of July, 2005 upto 5th December, 2008 and @ Rs. 4,000/- from
The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam, ... vs M. Munikrishna Reddi (Died) And Ors. on 5 July, 2004
learned Additional District Judge, while passing the judgment in M.V.O.P. No. 883 of 1998, recorded a finding that R.W. 1 Ravuri ... Motu Proceedings against R. Karuppan, Advocate, . Their Lordships K. T. Thomas, R. P. Sethi and B. N. Agrawal observed as follows :
"An affidavit
P. Royappa v. State of T.N. , , State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas , , State of A.P. v. G. Sreenivasa Rao , , Narendra Kumar Chandla
identical question had come up for consideration in the case of P. Satyanarayana v. State of Andhra Pradesh , before a Bench of this Court ... Sukdeo Kumar v. State of Bihar, . P. C. Oommen v. R. T. Board. Kottayam. and K. M. Thomas v. State Transport Authority , and contended that
