M/S Chalet Hotels Limited vs M/S Hindustan Aeronautics Limited on 29 May, 2020
Bench of High Court of Bombay in P.I.L.No.84/2014 is of
no relevance, inasmuch as , the said judgment relates ... through a
Contractor was not the subject matter of the said PIL.
54. Similarly, the reliance placed upon by the FCI in
respect
JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.4095 OF 2020 (GM-RES) PIL
BETWEEN:
1. B T VENKATESH
S/O B N TRISULI
AGED ... CROSS, RMV EXTENSION,
SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 080
ENROLMENT NO. KAR 558/2014
4. PRADEEP NAYAK
S/O DR GANESH NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
OFFICE
Adalath in Regular First Appeal No.481/2005 on
12th April 2014. By order dated 12th April 2017 passed
by a Division Bench of this ... temple belongs to the
villagers. That is the second reason why PIL is not
maintainable as the petitioners have a personal
interest.
3. Therefore
Amruthesh N P vs The Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2020
Author: Ravi Malimath
Sri T N Raghupathy vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 31 January, 2020
Equivalent
Dr. Siby Mathews vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 8 December, 2020
Author: Suraj
Karnataka Kaigarika ... vs State Of Karnataka on 8 May, 2020
Author: G.Narendar
Bench: G
Campaign Against Hate Speech vs State Of Karnataka on 13 May, 2020
Author: B.V
Basava Colony Abhivrudhi Samiti vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 March, 2020
Author: Abhay