Sultan Singh ,Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer Ward 25(1)(1), ... on 21 March, 2025
shows that applicant has been charged for
offences punishable u/s 376 , 366 , 509 , 323 of IPC. Thus,
investigation is already completed. There is reference
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 555 (2.09 seconds)Inder Kumar Hasani vs Indian Tourism Development ... on 3 January, 2023
under Section 235
(2) of the CRPC of the offence punishable under section
363 , 366 , 376 and 506 of the I.P.C because want ... infirmity
in the disciplinary proceedings.
11. As far as the quantum of punishment is
concerned, it relates to the charges which mainly
K.M Kunjumol vs The Principal General Manager on 15 November, 2012
2957/2002 of the Judicial I Class Magistrate Court, Ramankary under
Section 366 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Therefore, Crime No. 109/2002 ... 2002 was registered alleging commission of the offences punishable
under Section 366 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code against the applicant's husband
S.V.K. Mahesh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 29 April, 1999
applicant in the criminal case was prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 363 , 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. But the accused ... applicant was eventually acquitted can have no bearing on the quantum of punishment in the disciplinary proceedings. The contention raised by the respondents that
Ex Constable Yash Pal Singh-3364/Dap ... vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi Through Chief ... on 16 October, 2006
upholding the punishment in appeal.
2. The facts of the case reveal that an FIR No.619 dated 15.7.2004 under Sections 341 / 366 ... date. The allegation against the applicant as evident from the order of punishment appears to have been that he was involved in the incident
Parshu Ram Prasad vs All India Institute Of Medical Sciences on 25 October, 2011
366 that the interests of justice equally demand that the guilty should be punished and that technicalities and irregularities which do not occasion failure
Neeraj Sharma vs Sanjay Mitra &Amp; Ors on 25 November, 2019
November, 2019
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench
CP No.366/2019
OA No.2718/2014
New Delhi, this the 25th day of November ... 366/2019 in OA No. 2718/2014
against him. The OA was partly allowed on 01.05.2019
modifying the punishment to the one of reduction
Rahul Kumar vs Union Of India on 23 February, 2009
June, 1974 was by way of punishment. It was founded on the FIR under Section 363 / 366 IPC. His services were terminated on account
J Arun Anand Raj vs Police on 18 July, 2019
renders him liable for
punishment under Rule 9.3 ofsaid Police Manual.
ARTICLE-II
That, on 16/04/2007 u/s 366 / 361 IPC was registered
Kamlesh Kumar Mandavi vs M/O Communications on 4 July, 2023
sheet, the respondent no.3 passed
an order dated 15.3.2013 whereby the punishment of recovery to the tune of
Rs. 1,03,500/- has been ... stated that against the punishment order dated
15.3.2013, the applicant rushed to this Tribunal by filing O.A. No. 366 of
2013, which was disposed