Postmaster, Dargamitta H.P.O., ... vs Raja Prameeelamma (Ms) on 1 May, 1995
Equivalent citations: JT1998(9)SC100, (1998)9SCC706, AIRONLINE
from treasuries is not made, for themselves and their establishments ; (e) Head Postmasters for (i) themselves, their gazetted subordinates and the establishments of which
relevant time, have been employees of the office of the Postmaster-General, Bihar Circle, at Patna. I shall, therefore, proceed to state the relevant facts ... Society. But then they did not envisage to exclude employees of the Postmaster-General's office from being members of the Society. In that
Communication and I.T. Department of
Post, New Delhi.
2. Chief Postmaster General (Accounts), Haryana Circle, Ambala.
... Review Applicants (Respondents ... Technology, Department of
Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.
2. Principal Chief Postmaster General, Haryana Circle, Ambala
Cantt-133001.
3. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices
from July 1963 to May 1964. Fatehsingh PW 2 was the Postmaster in-charge of that Post office. It is not disputed that on November ... learned Trial Magistrate acquitted him mainly on the ground that the Postmaster was inimical to him and that the appellant had maintained all the time
Superintendent of Post Offices, Salem West Division, Salem, the post of Branch Postmaster, Kattanachampatti Branch Office in account with the Rasipuram Sub Post Office fell ... further stated that the vacancy for the post of Branch Postmaster, Kattanachampatti was notified and selection was done on 20-9-98. Page
Postmaster General Kerala & Ors. vs Kiron Rasheed on 31 March, 2011
NATIONAL
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
REVISION PETITION ... Appeal No.
207/2009
of the
State Commission, Kerala)
1. The
Postmaster General Kerala
2. The Sr. Supdt. Of Post Office,
Kollam Division Kollam
Postmaster, Department Of Post ... vs Dr. Vinod Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Chet ... on 16 July, 2012
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA,
PANCHKULA
First ... Date of Institution: 15.02.2010 Date of Decision: 16.07.2012
1.
Sub Postmaster, Department of
Post India,
Sector VIII, Post Office, Panchkula.
2.
Sr. Supdt.
Of Post
addressee not found' were examined to prove those
endorsements. The postmaster who proved the same has no
direct knowledge about the same ... endorsement no such addressee. This was proved
through PW12, the concerned postmaster. It is true that the
postman who made the endorsement was not examined
witness
stated that Indira Vikas Patras were to be forwarded to sub
Postmaster, Nither alongwith branch office slip for sanction and
::: Downloaded ... 2018 23:06:49 :::HCHP
13
branch Postmaster was competent to make payment up to
Rs.500/- and the amount is paid after tallying