ground that it is hit by the doctrine of partial preemption.
The preemptors preferred the connected appeal being Miscellaneous
Appeal No. 24 of 2013 which ... said application, holding that it is barred by doctrine of
partial preemption.
The preemptors by the proposed amendment are seeking to include the
said left
record.
The question raised in the instant revisional application is,
whether partial preemption lies, in the sense that the vendor sold
only a portion
Ayan Banerjee,
Mr. Suman Banerjee.
...for the petitioner.
The preemptee in a preemption proceeding has preferred
the instant revisional application against two orders ... case. By the second order dated January 2,
2019, apparently a partial report of the commissioner in respect of
the present petitioner's plot
The Caritas India vs Union Of India on 3 July, 2019
Author: Subramonium Prasad
Bench
Swami Ramdev & Anr. vs Facebook, Inc. & Ors. on 23 October, 2019
Equivalent citations
Tilak Raj Bakshi vs Avinash Chand Sharma(Dead) Through ... on 20 August, 2019
Equivalent citations
filed
by the State. The question involved was whether the
right of preemption would continue to be available
despite the repeal of the Punjab Alienation ... entire appeal would
abate. The reasoning was there could be no partial
pre-emption because pre-emption was the
substitution of pre-emptors in place
Bayer Corporation vs Union Of India & Ors. on 22 April, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Mahila Sukhdevi vs Somota on 15 May, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019 MP 569
1
Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2019
BIHAR
India
Bihar
