Pincon Spirit Ltd vs Crisil Ltd on 21 January, 2022
Author: Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur
OD - 52
ORDER SHEET
CS/18/2015 ... HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
PINCON SPIRIT LTD
VS
CRISIL LTD
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
Pincon Educational Trust vs Suneha Education Society on 20 July, 2022
OD-75
ORDER SHEET
CS/126/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ordinary ... Original Civil Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
PINCON EDUCATIONAL TRUST
-VS-
SUNEHA EDUCATION SOCIETY
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
Date : July
Pincon Educatonal Trust vs Suneha Education Society on 27 June, 2022
OD-48
CS/126/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL ... JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
PINCON EDUCATONAL TRUST
VS
SUNEHA EDUCATION SOCIETY
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
Date : 27th June, 2022.
The Court : None
applicant and co-accused person, who were
the Chairman and Agents of Pincon Group of Company, collected huge amount
from innocent persons assuring them
accused persons, who
were the Director, Manager, Employees and Agents of Pincon Group of
Company had collected huge amounts from innocent persons assuring them
that
applicant and co-accused person, who were
the Chairman and Agents of Pincon Group of Company collected huge amount
from innocent persons assuring them
accused persons, who
were the Director, Manager, Employees and Agents of Pincon Group of Company
had collected huge amounts from innocent persons assuring them that
accused persons, who
were the Director, Manager, Employees and Agents of Pincon Group of Company
had collected huge amounts from innocent persons assuring them that
applicant and co-accused person, who were
the Chairman and Agents of Pincon Group of Company collected huge amount
from innocent persons assuring them
applicant and co-accused
person, who were the Chairman and Agents of Pincon Group of
Company, collected huge amount from innocent persons assuring
them ... mentioned that
applicant is the agent of Pincon Group of Company but in the case
diary statement of prosecution witnesses recorded by the
investigation officer
