Section
91 proceeding already initiated becomes bad for inclusion of
wrong plot numbers and for no notice involving any fresh
proceeding under Section ... level of appeal and for the unfortunate inclusion of the
wrong plot number, the Development authority itself was to
request the appellate authority for withdrawal
this reason, the suit deserves to be dismissed as the incorrect plot number
has been mentioned. This written statement was filed on 24.03.2017.
4 After ... obvious that the Plaintiffs realized their mistake of
misquoting wrong plot numbers. It serves nobody's purpose in allowing
the suit to proceed
mentioned that in the
printed brochure under reserved category C, number of plots were wrongly
printed 2 instead of one and for that corrigendum ... that first reservation wise number of plots were
allotted to the reserved category and then the remaining number of plots were
allotted to the general
sale deed from Plot No.678 to 640 as it has been
claimed that the plot number has wrongly been mentioned in the sale
deed ... sale deed in proper prospective as there was
pleading that plot number has wrongly been
mentioned and as such the identification of land
should
right to cultivate the land measuring 5 ½
bighas by mentioning wrong survey plot number which was not in
existence. The petitioner and said Ashutosh Kumar
being the
owner of the land, appertaining to Khata No.110, Plot No.167,
measuring an area 12 decimals, executed two registered sale
deeds ... Baitha and Budhan Baitha on
27.02.2015, but by mistake the plot number was wrongly
mentioned in the said exchange deed, as a result, the
complainant
petitioners stated that on the last date of
hearing, the plot number was wrongly given and they were owner of Plot
No.13 instead
that in paragraph no.1 of the order dated 03.07.2018, Plot
Number has wrongly been recorded as '374' in place ... circumstances, let in paragraph no.1 of the
order aforementioned 'Plot No.374' be read as 'Plot No.347'.
Accordingly
plot occupied by his client is different from the suit property which the
Plaintiff had purchased and there is confusion as to the khasra number ... claim that he had purchased the plot of
200 square yards, though the wrong khasra number was mentioned due to a
typographical error. The Trial
Shri Daya Nand Sharma vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 25 April, 2018
IN THE
