plot no. as 757 instead of 787. The deed of correction to read as Plot no.
787 was executed on 14.8.2012. The landlord of Plot ... difference in the boundaries, the mention of the wrong plot number was an
inadvertent error or misdescription holding as follows
found by him that in the sale deed, plot number
has wrongly been mentioned as 1353, the complainant made a request to
the vendors ... purchased the land of Plot No.1351 from other persons, but according to
him the plot number had wrongly been mentioned in the sale deed
plot no.479
in favour of the complainant .
After
receiving the free true copy, it is noticed that plot number is wrongly typed ... prejudice will be caused to the opposite
party by correcting the wrong plot number 479
into 497.
In view of the above
facts and circumstances
yards (94.41 meter.)"
4. In the decree, even plot number was wrongly
typed as 367/3-A/1-A/2-3 instead of plot
plot No. 99. The said land belongs to one Vinod
Kumar, hence it is suspected that in the sale deed the plot
number was wrongly ... learned counsel for the
petitioners that actually petitioners were purchaser of plot No.
705 which is a big plot having arrear
perusal, it was revealed that the plot number was wrongly mentioned as 35-B
instead of 35-A. The Opposite Parties, through e-mail dated ... plot No.35-A. It was
stated that the allotment of plot number, was the prerogative of the Opposite
Parties, and, accordingly, plot
members of complainant only.
It is admitted case of the parties that plot nos. 2483,
2484 and 2485 are not mentioned in the deed rather ... uncle Sitaram
Singh never objected area of any plot or mentioning wrong
number.
It is specifically submitted on behalf of petitioners that
to cast pressure
favour of the complainant but in place of plot no. 336, Plot No.
337 was mentioned in the sale deed. Initially, the vender was
ready ... deliberate wrong mentioning of plot number in the sale deed.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named
petitioner be released on anticipatory bail
plot no.
984 and three decimals of plot no. 985 but by mistake in the
registered sale deed instead of plot no. 984 wrongly plot ... decimals out of plot no. 984. It is mistake on the part of the scribe
who has wrongly mentioned the plot number in the sale
forged and fabricated documents thereby giving fictitious
and wrong number to suit property as plot No.5A with
malafide intention to grab the property
