Blaze And Central (P.) Ltd vs Union Of India And Ors. on 21 March, 1980
with safety both to themselves and their characters."
12. With these prefatory observations, may now briefly recapitulate the relevant facts and circumstances
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 129 (0.63 seconds)Shankerappa vs Sushilabai on 28 July, 1983
disputed handwriting and whether in Abe absence of such a prefatory clarification, the evidence would not be admissible. Indeed Supreme Court did not choose
Management Of Theatre Sanjaya vs The State And Ors. on 21 April, 1983
discuss the question of applicability of rules of natural justice with these prefatory remarks :-
"..... Natural justice is a great humanising principle intended to invest
Vijaya Steels Limited vs Bangalore Electricity Supply Company ... on 4 October, 2016
order to raise additional revenue as is made abundantly
clear by the prefatory note and the extract from the
46
statement of objects and reasons
M. Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 30 November, 2001
recommendations and would impose penalty on such delinquent official. The prefatory wordings of Regulation 14A indicate that it is a special procedure envisaged in respect
Prof. S. Dhawan vs Sri Dattaguru Sadananda Spiritual And ... on 11 October, 1990
raises interesting questions where force of law is tested.
2, With this prefatory remark, we proceed to analyse the events which have
V.T. Rajakumar And Anr. vs The State Transport Appellate ... on 10 March, 1980
question without the consideration of irrelevant or extraneous Matters.
4. With these prefatory observations, let me now examine the validity, of the reasons given
Bangalore University vs B.V. Om Prakash on 8 August, 1990
since the malice of mass-copying is spreading like cancer. With these prefatory remarks, we proceed to state the matrix of facts.
2. Om Prakash
A. Ahmed Pasha And Anr. vs C. Gulnaz Jabeen on 29 May, 2001
scope and
scheme of the Act.
12. We find it from the prefatory note of the "Statement of Objects and Reasons" appended
Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya vs State Of Karnataka on 3 December, 2014
para 2)
"2. A prefatory caveat. When examining a legislation from
the angle of its vires, the Court has to be resilient, not rigid