forgery of the promissory-note, the 2nd accused was the writer and the 5th accused the attestor of the promissory-note. And the charges against ... that the promissory-note was forged before the moitgage-deed was brought into existence, there was nothing done with the promissory-note at the time
petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
Plaintiff and the consideration mentioned in the Promissory Note is false and also that the Promissory Note is not a valid one.
16.Further ... recitals of Ex.A.1 Promissory Note, dated 01.10.1979 to the effect that in Ex.A.1 Promissory Note, there are recitals found in Tamil
forgery of the promissory-note, the second accused was the writer, and the fifth accused, the attestor of the promissory-note. And the charges against ... that the promissory-note was forged before the mortgage-deed was brought into existence, there was nothing done with the promissory-note at the time
forgery of the promissory note, the 2nd accused was the writer, and the 5th accused the attester of the promissory note. And the charges against ... that the promissory note was forged before the mortgage deed was brought into existence, there was nothing done with the promissory note at the time
these promissory notes are forgeries or that any one of them is a forgery. Prima facie, the promissory notes which have been exhibited in evidence ... Insolvency Act, on the person who alleges that the promissory notes are forgeries. That burden has not been discharged and indeed there is nothing
promissory note on 17.11.1992, and that the suit promissory note has been filed after correcting the month on which the suit promissory had been executed ... promissory note was not his own, and that therefore, he came to realise that the suit promissory note was a rank piece of forgery
suit Promissory Note in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant further submitted that the alleged suit Promissory Note was a rank forgery ... suit Promissory Note Ex.A.1 executed by the defendant. But, the defendant has denied the execution of the said suit Promissory Note
Suit Promissory Note and that they had not received the consideration and also that the signatures found in the promissory note do not belong ... behalf of the Respondents/Defendants that Ex.A1-Promissory Note is a forgery one and that it has not executed
