that the respondents would
repay the amount while the appellant would execute pronotes
as surety. The appellant accordingly executed certain
pronotes whose consideration was received ... also on behalf of the respondent No. 1 firm
executed two pronotes for sums of Rs. 2,15,000/- and Rs.
4,72,000/- being
lacs was given by the complainant to the accused, who executed a pronote
dated 15.05.2012 and promised to pay interest @ 1.5% p.m. The accused ... loan of Rs. 4 lacs from
his sources. The accused executed a pronote dated 20.07.2012 after
receiving the said amount and agreed to pay interest
Court found that the respondent had
admitted his signatures both on the Pronote
and also on the two cheques ... adduced by the parties, the Trial
Court held that the Cheques and Pronote were
issued for repayment/discharge of a lawful
debt. The respondent
defence of the accused was that the complainant made over one blank pronote and blank cheque bearing No. 0697890 to a fictitious person by name ... Vysya Bank Limited, Arundelpet Branch, Guntur, to discharge the debt under pronote. On the next day, he presented Ex. P-1 cheque for collection
Code. The prayer made in the application was that the disputed pronote and receipt 11-2-1998 be sent to Forensic Science Lab. Govt ... defendant-petitioner for recovery of Rs. 5,83,400/- by propounding a pronote and receipt dated 11-2-1998. The defence taken by the defendant
recovery of Rs. 1,500/-on the basis of a pronote and a receipt dated 11-6-1962 for Rs. 1,000/- alleged to have ... grounds that the defendants neither borrowed any amount nor executed the pronote and the receipt in suit; that the plaintiff had to get a joint
inclusive of interest, on the basis of a pronote for Rs. 25,000 dated 13th of May, 1949. There are three defendants in this case ... According to the plaint, Moha Lal defendant No. 2 had executed a pronote (P/A) for Rs. 25,000 in favour of the plaintiff
suit in Delhi against the petitioners defendants on the basis of a pronote which was made and delivered on 9-6-1978 in Bangalore ... apply to negotiable instruments. The moneys due under the pronote being payable on demand, the natural inference was that the moneys were payable
Hira Lai being the brother of Fateh Chand, was not shown This pronote was daterl and October 1927. On 4th March 1937 a creditor Suia ... properties given by the applicants and Btated that they had concealed the pronote of 31st October 1927. That pronote was therefore included in the list
with interest @ Rs.2% P.M. In consideration
thereof, he executed the pronote and receipt of even date in favour of the
plaintiff, who made ... that he did not obtain any loan from the plaintiff against
any pronote. He used to sell his produce through firm M/s Professor Sikri
