promissory note in suit against the third defendant in spite of its finding that the promissory note was a forgery; and that Order 41, Rule ... cash by the plaintiff. A promissory note is a valuable security. If the promissory note was a forgery and the plaintiff had paid
forgery of the promissory-note, the 2nd accused was the writer and the 5th accused the attestor of the promissory-note. And the charges against ... that the promissory-note was forged before the moitgage-deed was brought into existence, there was nothing done with the promissory-note at the time
been brought on a forged promissory note, and for supporting the said case contended that the original promissory note had been fraudulently suppressed. Evidence ... body of the promissory note and of the letter of deposit of title deeds (Ex. N). The promissory note was filed with the plaint
suit
promissory note, nor has he received any consideration
thereunder. The purported signature of this defendant in
the promissory note is a forgery. Even ... signature
to the promissory note as alleged. At the time when this
defendant affixed his signature to the promissory note,
no stamps were affixed
your duties, fraudulently forged promissory notes in respect of the amounts allegedly disbursed and used those Tamasaka (Promissory Notes) as genuine documents which you then ... does speak about fraudulently forging of promissory notes and the forgery regarding Promissory Note is provided under the provisions of Section 467 , IPC, which provides
promissory note is forged but he did not make any attempt
to prove that the signature of the defendant appearing on the promissory
note ... promissory note.
The defendant thereby has abandoned his claim of forgery. The promissory
note was marked as Exhibit A3 without any objection. We have perused
over blank signed promissory notes
and cheques to Y. Nagabhushan Rao and said Y. Nagabhushan
Rao, taking advantage of those promissory notes got filed ... over blank signed promissory notes and cheques,
he is not entitled to contend that the signed blank promissory
notes are rank forgery, since the petitioner
petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
Plaintiff and the consideration mentioned in the Promissory Note is false and also that the Promissory Note is not a valid one.
16.Further ... recitals of Ex.A.1 Promissory Note, dated 01.10.1979 to the effect that in Ex.A.1 Promissory Note, there are recitals found in Tamil
