Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 363 (0.72 seconds)

M.Abdulla vs The Superintendent Of Police on 9 October, 2025

Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article ... respective stages are extracted below: FIR Details and Police Offences Stage Station Puthanatham Police Station Section 430 of IPC Acquittal Crime No.02/1997 Puthanatham
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fathima vs The District Collector on 29 September, 2023

Superintendent of Police, Trichy District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District. 6.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board ... Millath Road,Palakkarai, Trichy. 8.Rahmathullah, The President, Ahle Sunnathwal Jamath Palliwasal, Puthanatham, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 9.Syed Mohamed Rabeek, The Secretary, Ahle Sunnathwal
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - B Pugalendhi - Full Document

Fathima vs The District Collector on 29 September, 2023

Superintendent of Police, Trichy District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District. 1/20 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... Millath Road, Palakkarai, Trichy. 8.Rahmathullah, The President, Ahle Sunnathwal Jamath Palliwasal, Puthanatham, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 9.Syed Mohamed Rabeek, The Secretary, Ahle Sunnathwal
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - B Pugalendhi - Full Document

Fathima vs The District Collector on 29 September, 2023

Superintendent of Police, Trichy District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District. 1/20 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... Millath Road, Palakkarai, Trichy. 8.Rahmathullah, The President, Ahle Sunnathwal Jamath Palliwasal, Puthanatham, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District. 9.Syed Mohamed Rabeek, The Secretary, Ahle Sunnathwal
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - B Pugalendhi - Full Document

A.Raman vs Shanmugasundaram on 21 April, 2021

Petitioner is that he had applied for permit to operate minibus from Puthanatham to Kaulpannai on 04.12.2002. As no order was passed by the first ... Petitioner had filed an application seeking permit for a modified route from Puthanatham to Kadaipitchampatti. The authority had rejected the said application on 28.07.2003. Aggrieved
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohamed Hanifa vs The Chairman on 8 September, 2010

petitioner had submitted that the petitioner has been elected as Muthavalli of Puthanatham Jumma Pallivasal, Manamadurai Taluk, Trichy District. The petitioner had been elected ... Since then, the petitioner has been functioning as the Muthavalli of the Puthanatham Jumma Pallivasal. While so, on 16.07.2010, the fourth respondent and certain others
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M Jaichandren - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next