Chhotelal vs Jamnadas on 31 March, 1962
opinion the correct law was laid down in Ram Rup v. Naik Ram , AIR 1926 All 252. It is well established that when an appeal
Search Results Page
Search Results
111 - 120 of 38020 (3.27 seconds)Chandru @ Ramchandra S/O Ram Naik vs Ganapati Rama Bhat on 16 June, 2014
Chandru @ Ramchandra S/O Ram Naik vs Ganapati Rama Bhat on 16 June, 2014
Author: A.V.Chandrashekara
Bench: A.V. Chandrashekara ... 5721/2010 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
CHANDRU @ RAMACHANDRA,
S/O RAM NAIK, AGE: 51 YEARS,
OCC.: AGRICULTURIST, R/O KUJALLI,
TQ.: KUMTA, DIST.: UTTARA KANNADA.
- APPELLANT
Benode Behari Mullick vs Sita Ram Naik Daji Kalia And Ors. on 29 March, 1909
Benode Behari Mullick vs Sita Ram Naik Daji Kalia And Ors. on 29 March, 1909
Equivalent citations: 1IND. CAS.666
JUDGMENT
1. The decision ... this appeal depends on the interpretation of the Will of one Ram Chander Maulik, dated the 9th of April 1897. By that Will Ram Chander
Naik Ram And Anr. vs Bhagwan Chand on 30 March, 1917
Naik Ram And Anr. vs Bhagwan Chand on 30 March, 1917
Equivalent citations: 42IND. CAS.613
JUDGMENT
1. The Court undoubtedly had jurisdiction to extend
State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr. vs Jangvali Singh And Ors. on 16 May, 2003
decision rendered in the case of Surender Pratap v. Ram Naik and Ors. , AIR 2001 SC 164, wherein Their Lordships of the Apex Court ruled
Gopal Gangaram Kothavale vs The State Of Maharashtra on 17 March, 2005
Louis hired the services of a retired Government officer PW 12 Gangaram Naik who had retired from the office of the District Inspect of Land ... office of DILR i.e. PW 12. Accordingly PW 12 Gangaram Naik, a private surveyor, came to land survey No. 196 for the purpose
Hemant Sahu vs Smt Shailja Samuel on 16 July, 2009
Shailja Samuel
N Kalidasan Managing Director
Mehtaru Ram Thakur
Roop Singh
Tika Ram Thakur
Mehtar Ram Sahu
Harish Ch&andra
Dhel Singh Thakur
Santosh ... Mani Patel
Sawant Ram Sahu
Ram Kailash
Ram Lakhan Sharma
Gyan Singh Tripure
Lekh Ram Sinha
Sukal Singh
SK Soni
Ram Ashish
BL Kachlam
The State Of Maharashtra vs Flora Santuno Kutino And Ors. on 9 February, 2007
further, stated that thereafter he called accused Arjun Naik, Ganu Naik, Subrao Patil and Ramchandra Naik and made enquiry from them and they told that ... Memorandum of production of torch by accused No. 4 Ramchandra Naik dated 24.8.86. (Exhibit 35)
18. Another panchanama dated 24.8.86. (Exhibit 36).
Page
Prabhat Bora vs State Of Assam on 4 September, 2002
doubt.
9. AIR 2001 SCC 164 ( Surendra Pratap Chauhari v. Ram Naik and Ors. ). That was the case where evidence of eye witness was believed
Discussion Regarding Resolution Passed By Jammu And Kashmir Legislative ... on 26 July, 2000
Discussion Regarding Resolution Passed By Jammu And Kashmir Legislative ... on 26 July, 2000
Title: Discussion