ACCUSED
IN C.C.NO.1441/2021, IN BHATKAL ROR CASE NO.29/2021,
FIR NO.22549/2020-21, FOR THE OFFENCES
MARUTHI OMNI) SEIZED
ON CONNECTION WITH CASE ROR NO.12/2022-23 PENDING IN
FOC.NO.12/2022 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE ... proper
panchnama to keep such articles in a bank locker.
In any case, such articles should be produced
before the Magistrate within a week
dated 19.04.2023
(Annexure P-8) passed by respondent No.2 in case ROR No.32 of 2022
titled as Prompt Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner ... aside the instrument
of partition dated 23.01.2017 (Annexure P-2) passed in case No.215/
Tehsil/08 of village Begampur Khatola titled
land tax only as Nilam since the property is described in
the ROR as Nilam.
3. The prayer of the petitioner is to effect mutation ... been taken place, in some cases the category was
mistakenly entered as Purayidom. In this case ROR was issued to the
petitioner and the online
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in
the present case ROR-73-2022 was filed by the petitioner before the
Financial Commissioner, Haryana ... that the
ROR is also now fixed for 09.02.2023 before Financial Commissioner
(Revenue), Haryana. It is submitted that in the present case the
service
issuance of
directions to respondent No.1 for taking up the case ROR No.558 of 2023
for preliminary hearing and deciding the application ... that ROR is fixed for hearing on 28.08.2023.
After hearing counsel for the parties and going through the facts
and circumstances of the case
operation and restriction to correct the ROR,
pursuant to the notification circulated by the Revenue
Department, when no ROR could be corrected for a long ... forum below under a specific Act.
Secondly, the ROR of the case schedule land stands in
Page 32 of 53
favour of the State Government
Whether the learned courts below failed to appreciate that
1973 ROR and 1988 ROR showing entry of possession of
the Plaintiffs over the suit land ... face of the 1973 and 1988 ROR and the
order passed in Objection Case No.3099 (Ext.8), without
delivery of possession, no right, title
case. The decisions in
G.PADMAVATHI's case (1 supra), PATEL RAGHAV NATHA's case
(2 supra), K.SIDDIAH NAIDU's case ... GOUTHAM RAO's case
(5 supra), SANNEPALLI NAGESWAR RAO's case (6 supra) and
B.PUSHPAMMA's case (9 supra
petitioner had purchased the land and got his name
registered in RoR, vide Case No.90/1992.
Consequentially, the grievance of the petitioner was
considered ... 1155 dtd
23.03.2984. Accordingly,52 nos. of
employment and 65 no. of cases of cash
compensation in lieu of plot has already been
provided