rule of law. [68D-E]
By judicial direction, the rights and previliges of the
accused have been curtailed without any justification in
law. [ 68B]
State ... literal meaning is not clear that one resorts to the golden
rule of interpretation or the mischief rule of
interpretation. [66C]
Sussex Peerage Claim
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh vs Jai Prakash University And Ors on 24 July, 2001
Equivalent citations
Daman Sharma vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 29 March, 2023
Author: Virender Singh
Bench
V.K. Bhatt, Provident Fund Inspector vs Aryodaya Ginning Mills Limited on 22 June, 1995
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh vs Jai Prakash University And Ors on 24 July, 2001
Author: B
State vs . Harish Dua @ Sanjay on 29 January, 2011
IN THE COURT OF Dr. KAMINI
present case came to the knowledge of the police vide DD No.68B
Ex.PW2/A. In the charge sheet, it has been explained ... brick from the
place of incident, has not come on record to rule out the possibility of
its plantation upon the accused. It is further
Fir No.374/2014: State vs Pappu: Ps Subhash Place Dod: 10.02.2015 on 10 February
Fir No:593/17 Ps: Dabri State vs . Manjeet Kaur on 5 May, 2022
[1
Fir No:750/17 Ps: Dabri State vs . Surender on 19 April, 2022
[1]
IN
