Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 7127 (1.59 seconds)

The State Of Maharashtra And Another vs Rupchand Narayan Shinde And Others on 30 August, 2022

Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 3. The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Mantralaya Mumbai. 4. The State of Maharashtra, Through ... Beed. .. Applicant Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. Shivaji Goraknath Aundhkar
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 72 - S V Marne - Full Document

Punjabrao Shrihari Wadje Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 16 January, 2017

Maharashtra, Through the Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra in Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Fort, Mumbai - 32. 2. The State Election Commission, Maharashtra State, Through ... Ahmednagar. .. Petitioners. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32. 2. The State Election Commission, Maharashtra
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 62 - V M Kanade - Full Document

Shankar Limbaji Balkone vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 27 February, 2017

Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Mantralaya Mumbai- 400 032. 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Mantralaya Mumbai- 400 032. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 11 - T V Nalawade - Full Document

Charan S/O Sovinda Waghmare vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 April, 2012

District Bhandara. ....PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032. 2.Shri Ranjit Kamble, Minister of State ... government that government resolutions dated 25.06.2008 and 15.07.2008 issued by the Rural Development Department are not applicable to the DPC. He has also explained

Suresh Vitthalrao Bele vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 27 February, 2017

Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Mantralaya Mumbai- 400 032. 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Mantralaya Mumbai- 400 032. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - T V Nalawade - Full Document

Shri Nilesh Madanrao Thakre vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The ... on 20 March, 2019

6727.18.odt 1. State of Maharashtra, Through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, Through its Chief Executive ... State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, through its Chief Executive Officer, having office
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - S B Shukre - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next