Police, State Vigilance Bureau, Haryana, Panchkula
bearing No.11113/1-2/SVB (Haryana dated 2.7.2008 in
the office of SP, State Vigilance Bureau, Haryana,
Gurgaon ... This was earlier investigate by Shri Ramesh
Pal, Deputy Superintendent of Police, SVB Unit,
Faridabad and thereafter Sh. Manbir Singh, Inspector,
SVB, Haryana, Mewat
that time of the alleged occurrence and
posted as Head Constable in SVB (H), Gurgaon. At the
time of the alleged occurrence
recorded. The
case property was deposited with Moharir Head Constable (MHC)
of SVB and the accused were put in the lock up at Police Station
Aravalli Project etc. The case was
initially enquired by Rajender Singh, Inspector, SVB,
Hisar and on the basis of inquiry conducted by
Rajender Singh, Inspector ... case was later on
investigated by Dilbag Singh, Inspector, SVB, Hisar.
Singh Gurpreet
2013.10.07 17:06
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this
Corruption Act (for short- "the Act")
registered at Police Station SVB, District Rohtak and all consequential
proceedings arising therefrom.
FIR in question ... registered at Police
Station SVB, District Rohtak and all consequential proceedings arising
therefrom are quashed.
(SABINA)
JUDGE
March 25, 2009
PARAMJIT
Corruption Act, 1988
('Act' for short), registered at Police Station SVB Gurgaon.
Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 18.5.2001, a
transformer along
Corruption
Act, 1988 ('Act' for short), registered at Police Station SVB (H),
Gurgaon.
Prosecution story, in brief, is that appellant was working
Corruption Act, 1988 (`the Act' for short) registered at Police
Station SVB Ambala.
Prosecution story, in brief, is that a fight had taken
place
dated 20.5.2002
registered at Police Station, SVB, Ambala. Vide judgment dated
17.4.2006 passed by the Special Judge, Kaithal, respondent No.2
was acquitted ... complainant Ashok Kumar gave an
application in State Vigilance Bureau (SVB) Unit
Kurukshetra to the effect that an electric meter was
installed in the house
dated 18.4.2007 registered at police station
SVB (H), Gurgaon.
The Special Judge, vide impugned judgment dated
21.2.2011, acquitted respondent
