Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 302 (0.87 seconds)

Manoj Kumar vs M/O Railways on 9 January, 2024

noted that the applicants are not disputing participation in the selection process till calling for aptitude test but raised question only ... candidate who participates in the selection process and remains unsuccessful, cannot be permitted to challenge the selection process subsequently. It is apt to mention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prem Prakash vs M/O Railways on 24 September, 2020

actual driving experience could be considered eligible for appearing in the selection process. Subsequent to that, vide memorandum of even no. dated 15.07.2014 (Annexure ... part of the selection process, were found eligible and considered for record verification. It included the applicant's name. Subsequently, vide OM of even
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shiresiya Savan Ashokbhai vs Posts on 30 January, 2024

applicant submits that the applicant had challenged his non-selection in the Sports Quota, the process of which was notified vide respondents recruitment notification dated ... participated in the selection process but was not selected. Subsequently, the entire selection process was cancelled and there was a fresh notification, setting into motion
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chetram Meena vs M/O Railways on 23 August, 2021

Pointsman/A. Subsequent to carrying out the aforesaid process, it was not open to the respondents to cancel the selection process in which the applicants ... subsequently, declared the result of written test. It is noticed that only 18 candidates i.e., applicants herein were declared successful in the selection process
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next