Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 618 (1.16 seconds)

Harish Yadav vs Union Of India on 20 July, 2018

said order/ information and all the applicants duly appeared in the subsequent selection process carried out on 7th and 8th April 1997. The result ... respondents on the selection process as on 23.08.2001. Hence, the impugned letter communicating cancellation of February, 1997 selection process was fabricated subsequently. This
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A Chandran vs General Manager N C Rly on 22 May, 2018

promotion on the post of Assistant Pharmacy Officer (Gr. B) as per selection Notification dated 3.9.2015 and in the list of successful candidate in written ... applicant was found eligible. He was allowed to participate in the selection process. Subsequently, respondents have declared the result in which name of the applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yogesh Kumar vs D.G. Ordance Factories on 10 July, 2025

subsequently filed a certificate showing only one arm affected and thus he was rightly selected by the respondents. There is no illegality in selection ... only in the right hand. There is no illegality in the selection process. Subsequently obtained handicapped certificate which is annexed with the counter affidavit
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Kumar vs Union Of India on 17 March, 2026

wherein severe irregularities were found in the selection process and thus respondents have rightly cancelled the selection process. It is also argued that inquiry ... person who had participated in the selection process. Since he participated in the selection process and subsequently on being unsuccessful in getting the selection
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next